Sarah Palin’s RNC Speech

Elections, GOP

I watched about 2/3 of the speech last night. I missed a chunk of it while I was putting my three year old to bed but of the parts I did see I think Palin hit a solid one to the back wall… not out of the park but good enough to make them run a while.

The best part following the speech was channel surfing to the major networks and seeing the faces of Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and all the other Obama Anchors. Hearing all these blowhards who have been openly campaigning for Obama for months have to react to that speech was great. You could tell they wanted to slam her up against a wall but just couldn’t find a way.

Enough about them… on to my favorite moments of the speech.

I came to office promising major ethics reform, to end the culture of self-dealing. And today, that ethics reform is the law.

While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor’s office that I didn’t believe our citizens should have to pay for.

That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay.

I also drive myself to work.

And I thought we could muddle through without the governor’s personal chef - although I’ve got to admit that sometimes my kids sure miss her. I came to office promising to control spending - by request if possible and by veto if necessary.

I suspended the state fuel tax, and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress.

I told the Congress “thanks, but no thanks,” for that Bridge to Nowhere.

If our state wanted a bridge, we’d build it ourselves. When oil and gas prices went up dramatically, and filled up the state treasury, I sent a large share of that revenue back where it belonged - directly to the people of Alaska.

And though both Senator Obama and Senator Biden have been going on lately about how they are always, quote, “fighting for you,” let us face the matter squarely.

There is only one man in this election who has ever really fought for you … in places where winning means survival and defeat means death … and that man is John McCain. In our day, politicians have readily shared much lesser tales of adversity than the nightmare world in which this man, and others equally brave, served and suffered for their country.

It’s a long way from the fear and pain and squalor of a six-by-four cell in Hanoi to the Oval Office.

But if Senator McCain is elected president, that is the journey he will have made.

It’s the journey of an upright and honorable man - the kind of fellow whose name you will find on war memorials in small towns across this country, only he was among those who came home.

To the most powerful office on earth, he would bring the compassion that comes from having once been powerless … the wisdom that comes even to the captives, by the grace of God … the special confidence of those who have seen evil, and seen how evil is overcome. A fellow prisoner of war, a man named Tom Moe of Lancaster, Ohio, recalls looking through a pin-hole in his cell door as Lieutenant Commander John McCain was led down the hallway, by the guards, day after day.

As the story is told, “When McCain shuffled back from torturous interrogations, he would turn toward Moe’s door and flash a grin and thumbs up” - as if to say, “We’re going to pull through this.” My fellow Americans, that is the kind of man America needs to see us through these next four years.

For a season, a gifted speaker can inspire with his words.

For a lifetime, John McCain has inspired with his deeds.

10 Comments

  1. Oli  •  Sep 4, 2008 @10:15 AM

    If you really did see more than half of that and didn’t notice her saying things that might not be completely true, your finger is further from the pulse than you think it is.

    I’m not even talking fine detail - big statements that were just lies. And not even naming her “opponents”. Childish.

    It sounded like she was going for the magic speech formula. Perception is 70% “how you sound”, 20% “how you look” and just 10% what you say. With a voice like hers, she had to make it up in other areas.

  2. James  •  Sep 4, 2008 @1:43 PM

    I was fairly happy with her speech and people who have been fairly critical of her in the press were gushing over it this morning.

    Could you detail what you felt was an outright “lie” for us?

    I thought her statements aimed at Obama and Biden were well aimed. Why should she HAVE to name someone constantly.

    If she had 12 opponents I could see it being an issue, to clarify the target. If someone couldn’t figure out who she was talking about I don’t know what to say.

  3. nick  •  Sep 4, 2008 @1:49 PM

    Wait, did you not know who her opponent was? I mean I think at least 99% of the viewers knew who she was referring to, don’t you?

  4. rpcjr72  •  Sep 5, 2008 @1:23 AM

    Her speech was the same grandstanding that all politicians do. Bringing up McCain’s military career (which HE doesn’t even do anymore) was just another of those ghost patriotism spots Americans seem to shout for. Speaking about Obama was funny as she’s had LESS than 2 years as Governor when he’s had over 10 in the Senate; and on several important committees as well. Her lack of experience doesn’t mean she’s not ready, her lack of anything other than a local platform does.

  5. Oli  •  Sep 5, 2008 @3:59 AM

    The lie that really stood out was when she attempted to outline Obama’s stance on energy production. But rather than doing that, she decided to outline something she made up that she knew would make Republicans mad.

    That and talking about some mythical victory in Iraq which is apparently just around the corner; that Obama’s apparently going to forfeit for an early departure — again, at complete odds with his actual manifesto..

    I mean I acknowledge what you said on the 9r: these are all just words. Obama, McCain, Biden and Palin can all say as much as they like about themselves and it doesn’t mean they’re going to deliver. They’re all salesmen working on commission.

    My problem comes (from either side - I’m sure this isn’t isolated to Palin) when one side just makes shit up about the other candidates. Some people know the arguments on both sides and think less of her but some don’t and take what she says as truth. If this is what it’s come to, how long before we can expect:
    “Palin is a rapist. A filthy, HIV-carrying, heroin-smoking rapist. She told me she’d rape you and your family in a heartbeat. And she eats babies and shoots kittens.”

    If you can’t see that’s where she’s taking this, there’s really no point in discussing any of this with you.

    > Wait, did you not know who her opponent was?
    That’s really not the point. Go, watch some West Wing. It’s not polite and she has two opponents. It probably stood out to us because we’ve seen The West Wing but at best, to us, it made her look childish; at worst: an idiot.

  6. James  •  Sep 5, 2008 @6:31 AM

    Oli, you know full well this woman is far from an idiot…

    As for Iraq, The “victory” she spoke of is that we’re close to being essentially able to walk out of Iraq and many people who support the war, do not want to see us make an early departure and be seen as a country that admittedly may have made a mistake but doesn’t care enough to clean up our messes.

    rpcjr72,

    Speaking about Obama was funny as she’s had LESS than 2 years as Governor when he’s had over 10 in the Senate; and on several important committees as well.

    I REALLY hope you were trying to refer to Biden there and not Obama.

    Obama was elected to his first term in the Senate in November of 2004 - That would make his term in the legislative branch of government 4 years not 10.

    Barack Obama has 4 years of Federal level Legislative experience and 7 years of State level Legislative Experience.

    Sarah Palin, who is not running against Obama, has 6 years of City level executive experience, as well as her current State level executive experience running the state of Alaska.

    I really don’t think anyone running for President that has never BEEN President before, really knows what they’re in for to begin with but if you’re going to claim your candidate has more “experience” than someone who actually HAS executive experience you’re fighting a losing battle. Legislative experience is not even close to the same thing as any form of executive experience.

  7. Oli  •  Sep 5, 2008 @8:39 AM

    Re Iraq: and what part of the Obama-Biden manifesto says, once they come into power, they’re going to issue an immediate recall of all overseas troops? Not only does he have a widely approved plan for staged withdrawal, he has possibly the best advisor as his VP should anything go awry.

    My point was, she isn’t just reinterpreting the text, she was lying for political brownie points…

    I’m not sure how the executive vs legislative experiences really trade off. They’re both pretty damned important when you’re in the top national seats. How well does city and state executive experience compare to national/international executive power? Doesn’t that also mean she lacks the experience it takes to get things done in Washington?

    I don’t think any of us could give a really accurate answer to those questions because we haven’t been there.

  8. James  •  Sep 5, 2008 @10:01 AM

    Historically, governors tend to make better Presidents than Senators. Of the 17, 20th Century Presidents… 8 of them had executive experience prior to their Presidency.

    When ranked in terms of effectiveness and success in their term in office by a compilation of opinions of 78 scholars, 5 of those with executive experience ranked as “Great” or “near Great” and only one with legislative experience made the cut… Truman.

    Presidents have to lead, and come to conclusions most legislators never have to make. Executives are used to this and legislators aren’t.

    I’m not saying Obama couldn’t possibly rise to the occasion, I just don’t think he’s cut out for the job in my opinion.

  9. Sean  •  Sep 5, 2008 @5:43 PM

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but hasn’t Obama been spending all his time in the last four years campaigning and not actually gaining experience? Seems to me Obama has been out doing that while Palin has been doing her job. Just my 2 cents…

  10. Aung Kyaw  •  Sep 7, 2008 @4:08 AM

    1. “I told the Congress “thanks, but no thanks,” for that Bridge to Nowhere.”
    Palin didn’t mention the fact that she supported the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere” when campaigning for governor. Her stance suddenly shifted after she became governor, and the $27 million of the allotted money went to other earmark projects in Alaska.

    2. “That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay.”

    The luxury jet wasn’t sold on Ebay. It was sold to a private businessman. [Personally I think it's clever how she didn't say 'sold' but said 'put' to be more in touch with the working class.]

    3. “I suspended the state fuel tax, and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress.”

    Palin, as mayor of a town of 9,000, hired a lobbying group to secure $8 million in congressional earmarks for Wasilla. That’s not counting the $28 million Wasilla received from federal earmarks before she left office. Even my hometown of 48,000 doesn’t have a lobbying group in Washington. During her first year as governor, her administration asked Congress for $550 million in earmarks. I don’t know what type of earmark reform she’s championing, when Alaska still receives a disproportionately high amount of federal spending. For 2008, her administration asked for $160.5 million and for 2009 her administration seeks $198 million (http://stevens.senate.gov/earmarks/Approps-StateofAlaska.pdf). Per person, Alaska receives over $500 in earmark spending, while the average for all states is around $50. I think it’s a terrible idea for Palin to argue she’s championing against wasteful spending when McCain’s state of Arizona’s the one that is the most frugal when it comes to earmark spending ($18 a person). I’m not saying that Alaska doesn’t need earmark spending, because its undiversified economy very much relies federal spending to provide jobs and keep money flowing into Alaska, but I think McCain is more suitable than Palin (who, as mayor of Wasilla, brought in $1000+ per person in federal earmarks) to argue he’s championing earmark abuses reform.

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. For further information please see my Comments Policy.